<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ASP.NET MVC vs Web Forms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sajithmadhavan.com/post/9/2009/01/30/programming/dot-net/asp-net/aspnet-mvc-vs-web-forms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sajithmadhavan.com/post/9/2009/01/30/programming/dot-net/asp-net/aspnet-mvc-vs-web-forms/</link>
	<description>Thinking About Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 22:54:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bartek</title>
		<link>http://blog.sajithmadhavan.com/post/9/2009/01/30/programming/dot-net/asp-net/aspnet-mvc-vs-web-forms/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Bartek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 22:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sajithmadhavan.com/?p=9#comment-46</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, the question is becoming blurred with a lot of the cool features of MVC making their way into Webforms. ASP.NET 4.0 added URL Routing, reduced ViewState, and greater control of the HTML mark-up produced by many ASP.NET controls, now the next version of Webforms will incorporate many more MVC features into Webforms.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.evonet.com.au/post/2011/03/05/What%E2%80%99s-coming-in-the-next-version-of-ASPNET-Webforms.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;What’s coming in the next version of ASP.NET Webforms?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, the question is becoming blurred with a lot of the cool features of MVC making their way into Webforms. ASP.NET 4.0 added URL Routing, reduced ViewState, and greater control of the HTML mark-up produced by many ASP.NET controls, now the next version of Webforms will incorporate many more MVC features into Webforms.  <a href="http://blog.evonet.com.au/post/2011/03/05/What%E2%80%99s-coming-in-the-next-version-of-ASPNET-Webforms.aspx" rel="nofollow">What’s coming in the next version of ASP.NET Webforms?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://blog.sajithmadhavan.com/post/9/2009/01/30/programming/dot-net/asp-net/aspnet-mvc-vs-web-forms/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sajithmadhavan.com/?p=9#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Hi. Nice article. I have some words to say about using WebForms when you need to develop an application in the smallest possible time frame. If the applications consists of simple forms, grids and lists (i.e. repeaters), web forms is a good option, but if you need to render some complex HTML, using webforms can be a nightmare. 

Other thing: using jQuery or prototype or some other javascript library, it´s easier with MVC than web forms (because you have obsolute controls about control names and ids)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. Nice article. I have some words to say about using WebForms when you need to develop an application in the smallest possible time frame. If the applications consists of simple forms, grids and lists (i.e. repeaters), web forms is a good option, but if you need to render some complex HTML, using webforms can be a nightmare. </p>
<p>Other thing: using jQuery or prototype or some other javascript library, it´s easier with MVC than web forms (because you have obsolute controls about control names and ids)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

